Domestic Violence Court

Domestic Violence Court helps re-offender rate decline; 370 have "graduated" from court-ordered counseling

By Fredricka Paul | Jackson Citizen Patriot

January 03, 2010, 8:48PM
A Jackson man accused of battering his girlfriend stood in front of District Judge R. Darryl Mazur on a recent Monday afternoon, shaking as he prepared to read a letter he wrote.

The victim, who is now the man's fiancée, wiped away her tears as she listened to him apologize and speak about how counseling he received as a result of Mazur's Domestic Violence Court has changed his life and improved his attitude.

Since the Domestic Violence Court in Jackson County began in 2005, almost 370 men and women have "graduated" after completing court-ordered counseling. The court was created through a partnership between the Jackson County District Court and AWARE Inc., an agency that works with victims of domestic violence or sexual abuse.

The goal, Mazur said, is to hold abusers accountable for their actions and offer support and guidance so they don't re-offend. He calls his caseload "homicide-prevention cases."

Mazur said the message to the community is simple: "Domestic violence is not going to be tolerated in Jackson County."

Jackson's Domestic Violence Court is one of about 30 such courts in Michigan, Mazur said. Since its creation, the percentage of domestic violence re-offenders here has decreased from almost 25 percent to less than 10 percent, Mazur said.

Police have responded to about 9,000 domestic-violence calls in Jackson County each year for the past several years.

In 2008, there were 9,967 domestic-violence calls, and about 500 to 600 of them resulted in charges that put them before a judge, Mazur said.

Those selected for the specialty court have been identified as being in a relationship where abuse is present, Mazur said. This includes dating, living together, having a child together or being married or divorced. The idea, he said, is to use criminal law to get an abuser into treatment.

The cases in the specialty courts are expedited to reduce the number of victims who may change their minds about pressing charges, Mazur said.

If a suspect wants a trial, it is scheduled within five weeks, instead of the couple of months it takes in traditional district and circuit courts. Nevertheless, victims not willing to step forward, or choosing to back out of their decision to testify, is still a downfall of the program, he said.

After being arrested and charged, offenders are ordered not to have contact with the victim. Once a person accepts responsibility and enters a guilty plea, Mazur said he or she is sentenced to 15 to 24 months of probation and assigned a probation officer.

Probation officers choose from three local programs they believe will best help the offender, Mazur said. Programs range from 26, 30 or 52 weeks and participants must pay their own fees, which average about $25 per week, Mazur said.

The programs are Catholic Charities' Aggression Intervention, which uses group facilitators to help people recognize that domestic violence is a choice, and acknowledge the use of power and control in their relationships in the hope of changing beliefs and behavior toward nonviolence; LifeWays' Recovery Technology Batterers Intervention Program, which uses workbooks and group sessions to teach anger and impulse control and appropriate coping skills; and STRIDE's Batterers Intervention Program, which uses group and one-on-one sessions and peer feedback.

"It gives us some individualism as far as treatment is concerned," Mazur said.

Those sentenced to 15 months' probation meet with Mazur about six times while going through counseling, he said.

"The idea of the specialty court is to have the court more involved in the rehabilitation process," Mazur said. "We make examples of their successes and failures and discuss areas of particular need. The idea is to be more of a father figure than a judge figure."

If offenders complete the program and don't re-offend, they receive no further jail time. First-time offenders can have the charge expunged. On average, offenders pay about $1,000 in fines, Mazur said.

LaDonna Glenn, domestic-violence program coordinator at AWARE, said she thinks Mazur's court has made a tremendous difference.

"It has helped with accountability," she said.  "I think Judge Mazur is not trying to break up families, he is trying to improve their actions and make them more accountable. It has put a dent in changing that type of behavior with batterers."

But 9,000 domestic-violence calls to police a year is still a lot, she said.  And that number does not reflect all incidents of domestic violence, Glenn said.

She believes more people are bypassing the police and using AWARE's services.

"There is still a whole population of people who don't want to report, they don't want to get police reports," Glenn said.

And, of course, there is the embarrassment factor. Women too often think they caused the abuse, she said.

Batterers come from all walks of life, all ages and all races, Glenn said.

They can be uneducated or jobless, or college graduates or CEOs.  

That's why "Curbing domestic violence is not a one-sided solution," Glenn said.

In 2003, the Real Men Project was created to stop domestic violence before it starts, said Dani Meier, founder of the group.

The program aims to encourage fathers to model healthy relationships to their children and teach them that violence in relationships is never acceptable, he said.

Next year AWARE will introduce a new movement, related to the Real Men Project, in which men in the community will mentor men and boys to help change their mindset on domestic violence, said Becky Filip, AWARE's executive director.

"It's a call to action to men to help stop domestic violence," Filip said. "A lot of people look at it as a relationship problem and not as a crime against women."

The program will focus on awareness and education and encourage men to get involved in preventing domestic violence, Filip said.

"The public still has the mindset that what goes on behind closed doors is not the government's business," Mazur said. "I don't believe that."

— Staff Writer Leanne Smith contributed to this report
.

Ending an epidemic - Millions of teens are in abusive relationships, and parents are often the last to know.

Few things thrill a 16-year-old more than being mistaken for a college student, and that was no exception for Jennifer Ann Crecente. Tagging along with her grandmother, Elizabeth Richeson, PhD, at APA’s 2004 Annual Convention in Honolulu, Crecente glowed when famous psychologists asked her what university she attended and what her major was. “She told them all she wanted to be a psychologist,” Richeson recalls.

Crecente, an honors student and hospital volunteer, never had the chance to realize that dream. In February 2006, her exboyfriend, Justin Crabbe, shot her in the back of the head and left her bleeding in the woods near her home in Austin, Texas. Crecente’s father, Drew, had no idea his daughter was in danger.

“I thought I was a pretty aware parent,” he says. “I thought I knew about the major dangers she faced, and I had talked with her about drugs, about sex, about strangers when she was younger. But I just did not have any clue that one in three teens were being affected by abusive relationships.”

After Jennifer’s murder, Drew Crecente and Richeson clocked hundreds of hours researching teen dating violence, and they were shocked by its prevalence: Of teens who date, one in five report they have been hit, slapped or pushed by a partner, and almost a third say they’ve been involved in an emotionally abusive relationship, according to a 2006 survey of 1,004 teens, commissioned by Liz Claiborne Inc. A 2003 survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of 14,956 high school students had a similar finding: According to results released in 2006, one in 11 high school students had been the victim of physical dating violence in the previous year.

Most people are surprised by these statistics, says Maritza Rivera, president of Aneesa Michelle’s Group, a nonprofit organization that raises the public’s awareness of teen dating violence. “It’s an unspoken epidemic, and it’s going on right in front of our faces,” she says.

If Rivera, Crecente, Richeson and many others are successful, it won’t be unspoken much longer. Through Aneesa Michelle’s Group, which Rivera named after her niece — who was killed by her boyfriend in 2008 — Rivera has given dozens of talks to high school students to challenge the belief that violence is an acceptable way to resolve conflicts. Crecente also started a nonprofit group, named for his daughter. Through Jennifer Ann’s Group, Crecente and Richeson have helped pass a law in Texas: H.B. 121, which mandates that every school district in the state have a policy on intimate partner violence and provides a model policy that includes education and prevention.

Since that law passed in 2007, several other states have followed suit, including Rhode Island and, most recently, Ohio. Jennifer Ann’s Group is also working to strengthen laws that protect teens with violent partners — by, for instance, allowing them to apply for protective orders on their own and ensuring harsh punishments for people who violate those orders.

Activists’ efforts are working. Pediatricians have begun screening young patients for abusive relationships. The media increasingly covers dating violence. And this year, Congress declared February to be “National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month” — a pronouncement that inspired hundreds of local agencies, state governments and nonprofit groups to redouble efforts to protect teens from intimate partner violence.

“We must teach our children what it means to have healthy relationships, free from harassment, fear and ... abuse,” says Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), who co-sponsored the Senate resolution that dedicated February to the cause.

The Rihanna effect

Even though there have been many heartening successes, says Crecente, getting people to take teen dating violence seriously sometimes feels like an uphill battle. Most people are simply not aware of how common it is, and when they do become aware of it, they tend to dismiss it as teenage silliness or — even worse — blame the victim.

A case in point: Following the 2009 beating of pop star Rihanna by her boyfriend, fellow pop star Chris Brown, the Boston Public Health Commission polled 200 teens and found that almost half felt that the assault must have been Rihanna’s fault. That poll came as no surprise to Rivera, who confronts those attitudes all too frequently when she gives presentations to high school students. “They’ll say, ‘Why did she keep arguing with him if she knew he was violent?’” Rivera says. “They say, ‘She must have done something to make him so angry.’”

Of course, it’s not just teens who can fail to take dating violence or its frequent precursor, abusive and manipulative behavior, seriously. When parents hear of harassing behavior, such as a teen being texted by her boyfriend dozens of times in an hour, asking where she is, who she’s with and what’s she doing, parents may dismiss it as puppy love, says Richeson. Teens may even interpret such jealous behavior as romantic. “Teens don’t always have a strong sense of self, and they sometimes don’t know what a healthy relationship is,” she says. “Or, they would rather have an unpleasant relationship than not have one at all.”

That intuition is backed up by research in the September 2009 Violence Against Women (Vol. 15, No. 9). In the study, CDC researchers convened 12 focus groups of middle-school students and asked them about romantic relationships. The researchers found that most students did not condone relationship violence, but they did tend to endorse a view that girls are expected to meet boys’ emotional and physical needs and not expect much in return — a power differential that can lead to coercive and violent behavior, says Rita Noonan, PhD, a CDC sociologist who authored the study.

Power imbalance also puts teens at risk for health problems, says Emilio Ulloa, PhD, a psychology professor at San Diego State University. Ulloa, with his student Christina Buelna, surveyed 290 college students and found that victims of interpersonal violence were more likely to report feeling powerless in their relationships and to contract sexually transmitted infections, according to the study published in the Journalof Interpersonal Violence, (Vol. 24, No. 8).

“Victims of interpersonal violence are less likely to have equal footing with their partners,” says Ulloa. “They may be less likely to complain if their boyfriend has multiple partners, less likely to refuse to participate in sexual activity and more likely to be coerced into it.”

The 2006 CDC report had a related finding: The roughly 1.5 million school students who’ve been the victim of physical dating violence in the previous year were more likely to have sex, binge drink, get into fights and attempt suicide. The study suggests that teen dating violence can tip off a cascade of other negative health consequences, and it underscores the importance of prevention efforts, Noonan says.

“All these negative health outcomes are preventable. They are not a natural part of teenage life,” says Noonan. “Our young people deserve a bright and healthy future.”

Raising awareness

Though researchers are working on many different tactics for preventing teen dating violence, most scientists and activists agree that the problem must be confronted simultaneously at multiple levels — through schools, parents and peers. To that end, Jennifer Ann’s Group is teaching teens, parents and other influential adults about the signs of teen partner violence, and how to respond to it. In particular, they have been distributing wallet cards that outline 10 signs of an abusive relationship and four steps for creating a safety plan. The card also lists a 24- hour, toll-free helpline.

“I wanted to make a card that is discreet. You can carry it in your wallet and it looks like a credit card,” says Crecente. “It’s also durable, so you can pass it along from friend to friend.” Hundreds of school groups, church groups and activists have requested the cards, including Rivera of Aneesa Michelle’s Group, who passed out the Spanish-language version at the Puerto Rican Day parade in New York last summer.

Such education efforts are vital to ensuring teens’ safety, says Julia da Silva, director of APA’s Office of Violence Prevention. “We know that most of the time physical and emotional violence against women is committed by someone they know, and it’s important to help women recognize the warning signs,” she says.

Keeping teens safe, while also making them less likely to put up with abuse as adults, is Richeson’s ultimate goal. Between therapy sessions at her private practice in El Paso, Texas, she’ll deliver cards to gynecologists’ and pediatricians’ offices. She’s also given many talks about teen dating violence to high school students, school nurses and administrators — to just about anyone who will listen.

“I’m working on creating a speakers bureau of psychologists who can give these talks, raise awareness and maybe even save lives,” she says.

Psychologists can also help by screening their clients — especially young ones — for abusive relationships at intake every year and whenever a client’s relationship status has changed. That exact screening policy, she adds, was passed by the American Academy of Pediatrics last year, and Richeson hopes psychologists will follow suit.

“Teens aren’t typically going to volunteer this kind of information,” she says. “You have to ask them directly.” Since the tragedy that turned them into crusaders against teen dating violence, Richeson and Crecente have sometimes felt overwhelmed by the extent of the problem. But it’s the trickle of e-mails they receive, from a teen who found their informational card and realized that it was time to leave an abusive relationship, or a parent who was inspired to give his daughter the talk that Crecente wishes he’d known to give, that keeps them going.

“There’s nothing we can do to bring Jennifer back,” says Crecente. “But at least we can try to keep other families from going through what we did.”

Domestic Situations are Some of the Most Dangerous for Police Officers

Police say when emotions take over people's actions, it can lead to violence and death.

Posted: 6:33 PM Mar 10, 2010
Reporter: Jennifer Dowling
Email Address: jennifer.dowling@wilx.com

Police say the fatal shooting that happened in Jackson this week is a testament to the way domestic situations can get out of control and can be very dangerous to responding officers.

Deputy Chief of Jackson Police John Holda says, "If one party doesn't want the relationship to end, or is upset for some reason, then they let their emotions take over their actions and that leads to violence and sometimes death."

Jackson Police have been involved in three fatal shootings in the past three years. All were triggered by domestic situations. Besides this week's shooting, police shot and killed 24-year-old Marshan Worthey after they say he pointed a gun at them in August 2008. He had killed his girlfriend shortly before police arrived. They also shot Terrance Wheeler in May 2009 after he murdered his ex-girlfriend. When police arrived, they say he was stabbing the woman and refused to obey orders to put down the knife.

The Jackson Police partner with the domestic violence shelter Aware Inc. in Jackson. The executive director says police get themselves into dangerous situations any time they respond to a domestic. Becky Filip says, "It doesn't matter sometimes who gets in between what he thinks is his, rightfully his and anybody who comes in between that is in danger and police officers are always going into a dangerous situation when they go into a domestic violence situation."

Every officer does train specifically for domestic disputes. Holda says, "The first thing you do is try to gain control of the situation because a lot of times when emotions are involved and people are upset, you try to control the individuals and try to calm the situation as much as you can...separate the individuals involved to separate rooms in the house."

When police respond, they also send two officers. Holda says, "Just because you normally have two people involved and want to separate them it is much more tactically sound and safe for the officers."

However sometimes deadly force is necessary to protect their lives and the lives of others. Filip says, "What the public really doesn't understand is that the police officer's life is in jeopardy, but there's also some emotional stuff that the police have to go through....The police officers have to then live with the fact that they took a life even though they were doing the right thing and it was in the process of doing their job. But, it's not an easy thing to live with."